Your IP: 38.107.179.210 United States Near: United States

Lookup IP Information

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

Below is the list of all allocated IP address in 34.5.0.0 - 34.5.255.255 network range, sorted by latency.

Edzard Ernst (January 30, 1948 in Wiesbaden, Germany) is the first Professor of Complementary Medicine in the United Kingdom. In 1993, Ernst left his chair in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) at the University of Vienna to set up the department of Complementary Medicine at the University of Exeter. He became director of complementary medicine of the Peninsula Medical School (PMS) in 2002. He is the first occupant of the Laing chair in Complementary Medicine. He was born and trained in Germany — Ernst began his medical career at a homeopathic hospital in Munich[1] — and since 1999 has been a British citizen. Ernst is the editor-in-chief of two medical journals, Perfusion and Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies.[2] Ernst once contributed a regular column to the Guardian newspaper, frequently reviewing news stories about complementary medicine from an evidence-based perspective.[3] Since his research began on alternative modalities, Ernst has become "the scourge of alternative medicine" for publishing critical research that exposes methods that lack documentation of efficacy.[4] Contents 1 Training and early career 2 Work in complementary medicine 3 Other work 4 Other significant posts 5 Books 6 References 7 External links // Training and early career Professor Ernst qualified as a physician in Germany in 1978 where he also completed his MD and PhD theses. He has received training in acupuncture, autogenic training, herbalism, homoeopathy, massage therapy and spinal manipulation. [5] Ernst began his medical career at a homeopathic hospital in Munich[1] In 1988, he became Professor in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) at Hannover Medical School and in 1990 Head of the PMR Department at the University of Vienna. Work in complementary medicine The world's first professor of complementary medicine,[4] Ernst researches complementary medicine with an emphasis on efficacy and safety. His research mainly surveys systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials; the institute has not performed a clinical trial for some time due to budget constraints.[4] He has over 700 papers published in scientific journals.[1] He has said that about 5 percent of alternative medicine is backed by evidence,[6] with the remainder being either insufficiently studied or backed by evidence showing lack of efficacy. Ernst's department at Exeter defines complementary medicine as "diagnosis, treatment and/or prevention which complements mainstream medicine by contributing to a common whole, by satisfying a demand not met by orthodoxy or by diversifying the conceptual frameworks of medicine."[7] Ernst asserts that, in Germany and Austria, complementary techniques are mostly practiced by qualified physicians, whereas in the UK they are mainly practiced by others. Ernst also argues that the term "Complementary and Alternative Medicine" ("CAM") is an almost nonsensical umbrella term, and that distinctions between its modalities must be made.[8] Since his research began on alternative modalities, Ernst, who is himself a former homeopathic practitioner, has become "the scourge of alternative medicine" for publishing critical research.[4] In 2008 publication in the British Journal of General Practice, Ernst's listed treatments that "demonstrably generate more good than harm" was limited to St John's wort for depression; hawthorn for congestive heart failure; guar gum for diabetes; acupuncture for nausea and osteoarthritis; aromatherapy as a palliative treatment for cancer; hypnosis for labour pain; and massage, music therapy, and relaxation therapy for anxiety and insomnia.[4] In 2008, Ernst and Simon Singh published Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial. The authors challenged Charles, Prince of Wales, to whom the book is dedicated, and the Foundation for Integrated Health on alleged misrepresentation of "scientific evidence about therapies such as homoeopathy, acupuncture and reflexology".[9] Singh and Ernst assert that Britain spends £500 million each year on unproven or disproven alternative therapies.[10] In their review of the book the New England Journal of Medicine described Ernst as "one of the best qualified people to summarize the evidence on this topic."[11] In 2008, Ernst sent an open letter urging the Royal Pharmaceutical Society to crack down on high street chemists that sell homeopathic remedies without warning of the evidence that they have no effect at all on human beings. According to Ernst, this disinformation would be a violation of their ethical code: "My plea is simply for honesty. Let people buy what they want, but tell them the truth about what they are buying. These treatments are biologically implausible and the clinical tests have shown they don't do anything at all in human beings. The argument that this information is not relevant or important for customers is quite simply ridiculous."[12] In a 2008 interview with Media Life Magazine, when Ernst and Simon Singh were asked this question -- "What do you think the future is for alternative medicine?" -- they replied: "For us, there is no such thing as alternative medicine. There is either medicine that is effective or not, medicine that is safe or not. So-called alternative therapies need to be assessed and then classified as good medicines or bogus medicines. Hopefully, in the future, the good medicines will be embraced within conventional medicine and the bogus medicines will be abandoned."[13] In an article entitled "Should We Maintain an Open Mind about Homeopathy?"[14] published in the American Journal of Medicine, Michael Baum and Edzard Ernst -- writing to other physicians -- wrote some strong criticisms of homeopathy: "Homeopathy is among the worst examples of faith-based medicine... These axioms [of homeopathy] are not only out of line with scientific facts but also directly opposed to them. If homeopathy is correct, much of physics, chemistry, and pharmacology must be incorrect... To have an open mind about homeopathy or similarly implausible forms of alternative medicine (eg, Bach flower remedies, spiritual healing, crystal therapy) is therefore not an option. We think that a belief in homeopathy exceeds the tolerance of an open mind. We should start from the premise that homeopathy cannot work and that positive evidence reflects publication bias or design flaws until proved otherwise... We wonder whether any kind of evidence would persuade homeopathic physicians of their self-delusion and challenge them to design a methodologically sound trial, which if negative would finally persuade them to shut up shop... Homeopathy is based on an absurd concept that denies progress in physics and chemistry. Some 160 years after Homeopathy and Its Kindred Delusions, an essay by Oliver Wendell Holmes, we are still debating whether homeopathy is a placebo or not... Homeopathic principles are bold conjectures. There has been no spectacular corroboration of any of its founding principles... After more than 200 years, we are still waiting for homeopathy “heretics” to be proved right, during which time the advances in our understanding of disease, progress in therapeutics and surgery, and prolongation of the length and quality of life by so-called allopaths have been breathtaking. The true skeptic therefore takes pride in closed mindedness when presented with absurd assertions that contravene the laws of thermodynamics or deny progress in all branches of physics, chemistry, physiology, and medicine." Other work In a May 1995 Annals of Internal Medicine publication, Ernst detailed the Nazi "cleansing" of the University of Vienna medical faculty that allowed the "medical atrocities" of Nazi human experimentation.[15] Other significant posts Ernst is a member of the Medicines Commission of the British Medicines Control Agency (now part of the MHRA) which determines which substances may be introduced and promoted as medicine.[16] He also sits on the Scientific Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products of the Irish Medicines Board.[17] He is an external examiner for several university medical schools in several countries.[18] Ernst is a Founding Member and on the Board of the newly formed (2009) Institute for Science in Medicine.[19] Books Healing, Hype, Or Harm?: Scientists Investigate Complementary Or Alternative Medicine. Imprint Academic, ISBN 1845401182, 9781845401184, 120 pages Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial. Transworld Publisher 2008. ISBN 978-0-59-30612-99 (The same book published in the USA is called Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine). The Oxford Handbook of Complementary Medicine. Oxford University Press 2008. ISBN 978-0-19-920677-3 Complementary Therapies for Pain Management. An Evidence-Based Approach. Elsevier Science 2007. ISBN 978-0-7234-3400-9 The Desktop Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine: An Evidence-based Approach. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2006, ISBN 0723433836, 9780723433835, 556 pages Homoeopathy: A Critical Appraisal. 1998. ISBN 0-7506-3564-9 "Professional reference text on homoeopathy is a critical evaluation of the discipline, reviewing the known facts and defining the knowledge gaps. It offers a reliable analysis of the uses of traditional homoeopathic remedies. Illustrated. For medical and professional homoeopaths, students, general practitioners, and health care professionals." Amazon. References ^ a b c Boseley, Sarah (2003-09-25). "Interview: Edzard Ernst". London. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2003/sep/25/scienceinterviews.health. Retrieved 2010-05-01.  ^ Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies ^ Edzard Ernst profile from The Guardian ^ a b c d e "Complementary therapies: The big con? - The Independent". London. 2008-04-22. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/features/complementary-therapies-the-big-con-813248.html. Retrieved 2010-05-01.  ^ "Edzard Ernst Profile on Peninsula Medical School website". http://sites.pcmd.ac.uk/compmed/ernst.htm. Retrieved 2010-03-25.  ^ Interview: The complementary medicine detective - Michael Bond, New Scientist, 26 April 2008 Magazine issue 2653. ^ Ernst et al. British General Practitioner 1995; 45:506 ^ http://www.harcourt-international.com/ernst/interview.cfm Interview: Harcourt International ^ Henderson, Mark (2008-04-17). "Prince of Wales's guide to alternative medicine ‘inaccurate’ - Times Online". The Times (London). http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/alternative_medicine/article3760857.ece. Retrieved 2010-05-01.  ^ Thompson, Damian (2008-04-26). "The last rites for alternative medicine? - Telegraph". The Daily Telegraph (London). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/04/26/do2606.xml. Retrieved 2010-05-01.  ^ Book review of "Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine." New England Journal of Medicine Volume 359:2076-2077 November 6, 2008 Number 19 ^ Ian Sample (2008-07-21). "Pharmacists urged to 'tell the truth' about homeopathic remedies". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/jul/21/pharmacists.homeophathy. Retrieved 2008-07-21.  ^ Heidi Dawley. Note to Prince Charles: 'You're wrong'. Book raises new doubts about alternative medicine. Media Life Magazine Apr 21, 2008 ^ Baum M, Ernst E (November 2009). "Should we maintain an open mind about homeopathy?". Am. J. Med. 122 (11): 973–4. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.038. PMID 19854319.  ^ Ernst E (May 1995). "A leading medical school seriously damaged: Vienna 1938". Ann. Intern. Med. 122 (10): 789–92. PMID 7717602. http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=7717602.  ^ http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Committees/Medicinesadvisorybodies/MedicinesCommission/Members/CON002258 ^ IMB newsletter http://www.imb.ie/images/uploaded/documents/3052778_Newsletter8.pdf ^ See publisher's details for Oxford Handbook of Complementary Medicine ^ Institute for Science in Medicine. House of Lords: Select Committee on Science and Technology Sixth Report The committee visited the Department at Exeter in 2000. student BMJ interview Biographical note on the authors of The Desktop Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine. An evidence based approach. Elsevier Science 2006 External links PMS staff page Official FACT website at University of Exeter Summary of the department's most important findings eg Homeopathy doesn't work, St John's Wort does. Publication lists for the department Google scholar: List of publications House of Lords Science and Technology - Sixth Report on Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Ernst testified and his department was visited. Q&A with Ernst in The International Review of Patient Care "Interview with Professor Edzard Ernst, Department of Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter". Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 8 (1): 32–34. January 2004. doi:10.1016/S1360-8592(03)00075-5.  Website for Trick or Treatment? book